Skip to content

Conversation

@yhmo
Copy link
Contributor

@yhmo yhmo commented Jan 8, 2026

No description provided.

@sre-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yhmo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @yhmo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces essential input validation for username parameters across both the ConnectParam and ConnectConfig classes. By preventing null or empty usernames from being set, the changes enhance the robustness and security of connection configurations, ensuring that only valid credentials can be used and providing immediate feedback for invalid inputs.

Highlights

  • Input Validation for Usernames: Added a check in ConnectParam.withAuthorization to prevent null or blank usernames, throwing an IllegalArgumentException if detected.
  • Input Validation for Usernames (V2 API): Implemented a similar validation in ConnectConfig.ConnectConfigBuilder.username to ensure usernames are not null or blank, also throwing an IllegalArgumentException.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@yhmo yhmo added the lgtm label Jan 8, 2026
@mergify mergify bot added the dco-passed label Jan 8, 2026
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds validation to prevent empty usernames in ConnectParam and ConnectConfig. The changes are correct and achieve the goal. My review includes a couple of suggestions to improve code consistency by using StringUtils.isBlank() for validation, which is already in use in the codebase. I've also noted a potential usability issue in ConnectConfig's builder related to how username and password settings interact, which could be considered for future improvements.

@mergify mergify bot added the ci-passed label Jan 8, 2026
@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit cbf0629 into milvus-io:2.6 Jan 8, 2026
5 checks passed
@yhmo yhmo deleted the 26 branch January 12, 2026 03:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants